Das Model 3 ist nämlich aller Kinderkrankheiten und Verzögerungen zum Trotz das neue Glanzstück der Marke. Warum? Weil dieser Tesla mit seinem Grundpreis von rund 39 000 Euro ein viel breiteres Publikum anspricht, weil man mit den kompakten Abmessungen in der Stadt deutlich besser zurecht kommt und weil selbst die kleinste Batterie mit 50 Kilowattstunden (kWh) kein lahmer Kriechstromer mit kurzatmiger Reichweite ist. Das zeigt die Testfahrt mit dem aktuellen Topmodell mit 75-kWh-Speicher, 192 Kilowatt starkem Motor und Vollausstattung - in Deutschland zu haben für 54 361 Euro
anthonybullard 1 hour ago [-]
I get what you're saying - as someone who is very concerned about bundle sizes currently - but if you are using something like Elm door a help world, you are already losing. Elm is for complex, highly dynamic user interfaces that need a high level of durability and maintainability. Toy projects like the one you describe are useful for learning the language and it's patterns, but for practical purposes it's like bringing in a concrete truck to patch a hole in your driveway.
Also, that bundle size is still smaller than react + react Dom. And you get the features of redux and immutable for free plus a solid, statically checked type system.
ch4s3 1 hour ago [-]
Yeah, bundle size isn't a real deal breaker, but it does make it a bit harder to roll into an existing project in small chunks. My main issue is the interop portion.
anthonybullard 1 hour ago [-]
I'd like to hear about your pain points with interop. I'll more than likely be talking to Evan soon and I can discuss with him. Also, he's pretty responsive in general. The community is pretty eager to help with these sorts of pain points - join the Slack.
ch4s3 20 minutes ago [-]
I think my biggest issue was the lack of any escape hatch for the development process. When you're trying to interop with JS and have to reason through the types that should be associated with the return value it can be a real slog if the JS returns a deeply nested object. I like that BuckleScript/ReasonML allows you to experiment with raw JS while figuring out the types.
kbenson 3 hours ago [-]
I'm not sure you understood what my point was. I was looking at reason as a replacement solution for my current stack, and the entire stack. That includes optimized multiprocessing code, processing daemons, ORM DB access (mostly a good query builder and normalized operations), a web framework, and HTML/JS page rendering/serving (I don't really care if it's rendered at the client or server level).
Right now it's 90%+ Perl, which I'm for the most part happy with, and the rest is JS, which I'm not exactly thrilled to deal with (Perl and JS are similar enough in some respects to make the parts of JS they flubbed really annoying). The main draw of ReasonML for me was the ability to have a stack of a single language that reached all the way up to the client browser and all the way down to the multi-process data retrieval and processing system.
Edit: As an aside, from a sysadmin perspective, it's somewhat troubling that the bucklescript toolchain fails to install through NPM as root. Leaving aside whether it's a good idea to have it installed as root (or for that matter whether NPM should ever be run as root), it bothers me that it would fail in some unknown way on a recent RHEL/CentOS system. Failing specifically because it doesn't want to be installed as root with a notice saying as much would have been acceptable, but having a bug like that exist makes me feel like there's not enough people using the system yet to shake out the bugs. It did damage my confidence in the toolchain somewhat.